#86: How To Defend Humanae Vitae—Dr. Janet Smith

#86: How To Defend Humanae Vitae—Dr. Janet Smith (video segment- full audio below)

What is Humanae Vitae, you ask? It’s the 1968 papal Encyclical by Blessed Pope Paul VI (who will be canonized this fall). I can still remember walking into the Daughters of St, Paul Catholic bookstore in Toronto when I was teaching high school there. My glance fell to a book titled, Humanae Vitae: A Generation Later by someone called Janet E. Smith. It had a huge effect on me. I was already on board with the norms of the Encyclical, but this Janet Smith person broadened and deepened my appreciation of the teaching, from multiple angles of consideration.

Well, I ended up meeting her at a couple of conferences through the years, and I’m so happy to present this interview with her. She is courageous, articulate, and knows the teaching inside and out.

 

In this episode you will learn:

  • The context in which Humanae Vitae was released and rejected
  • The level of authority with which the Encyclical is presented by the Church
  • A simple way to understand the why behind the what of the teaching
  • How soon-to-be-Saint Paul VI was vindicated as a prophet
  • How contraception paves the way for abortion
  • The moral difference between natural family planning (NFP) and contraception
  • Why NFP is good for marital longevity, happiness, and stability

 

Resources recommended in this episode:

 

Question of the week

Why is Humanae Vitae an excellent litmus test of Catholic orthodoxy?

Comment below or our Facebook page.

 

“Like” us on Facebook HERE

Sign up to the waiting list for our upcoming premium site Coffin Nation. You’ll be the first to be notified!

Tweet to Patrick HERE

 

Don’t forget to Subscribe to the show in YouTube, as well as the full length podcast available in iTunes and other podcast directories, while you are there, please leave an honest review.

Ratings and reviews are extremely helpful and greatly appreciated. Thank you!

            

 

 

 

Please share it using the social media buttons below.

Good-bye, Dad

Since the death of my father three months ago, I have re-read parts of A Grief Observed by C.S. Lewis, the blunt opening line of which tells the truth: “no one told me grief feels so like fear.” That’s about right.

I have watched two people die: my daughter and my father. Both occurred in controlled hospital settings, both were expected events, and both (God’s sustaining grace notwithstanding) hurt like hell. Otherwise, I have been entire shielded from direct experience with death for most of my life. All my grandparents were gone by the time I was 13. I barely remember their funerals.

While there no algorithm exists to calculate which loss felt worse (daughter Naomi, or father Jack), the fact that my daughter was 15 days old and my father was 82 certainly made the former unutterably more jarring than the latter. Really, the two experiences are incommensurable.

Naomi succumbed to a rare chromosomal condition called Partial Trisomy 9, my father Jack, in addition to multiple health challenges, to the common malady called renal failure. About 20 years ago, he was diagnosed with inclusion body myocititis (IBM), an auto-immune disease that causes progressive muscular degeneration. That’s what slowed him down, put him against a cane, then behind a walker, then finally in a wheelchair. Oh, and he also had vascular dementia. (Recall-wise, he was progressively iffy on certain things, people, and dates during his last year and a half on earth.)

One of my father’s maxims was, “Most people worry about things that never happen,” the same basic idea behind Mark Twain’s, “I’m an old man now and I’ve seen a great many problems I my life, except that most of them never happened.” Sadly (in a way), he never took his own advice when it came to the path he would walk with the IBM condition. He never wanted to join any online forums for fellow sufferers, was never interested in participating in clinical trials nor in trying this or that alternative treatment. He wanted a magic bullet, and he anxiously fretted about what the next decline would look like.

Lest this become maudlin and send the sane reader away, the rest of the story is shot through with grace and mercy. First, there was my prayer for my father, beginning on a pilgrimage my wife and I led in the spring of 2017. I was kneeling inside the cave in Bethlehem where St. Jerome translated the Septuagint Bible into Latin, and the words came, “Lord, heal my dad and be gentle with him.”

I can’t count how many times I prayed that prayer, daily, afterward. And while it will never be known if he experienced a bona fide physical healing from his multiple medical problems, that two-fold prayer was answered. First, his vascular dementia virtually vanished in his closing week on earth. He was lucid, clear-thinking, no slurred speech. He was sharp as a tack and wanted to talk about issues that arose in my recent interview on fatherhood and manhood with Dr. Gordon Dalbey.

My mother, Marian, told me that he didn’t seem all that interested in the Dalbey interview when she shared it with him on the home computer two weeks earlier. Appearances can be deceiving. For in the ICU, my father wanted to talk about the issues that arose in that Rev. Dalbey interview: about his own father, about God as Father, and about the insights connecting all the above. I ended up reading to him parts of Dalbey’s fine book Fight Like a Man: A New Manhood for a New Warfare.

So the extraordinary lifting of his dementia was the first answered prayer. It spared me the hatred of it that would arise in my heart when talking to him. Second, my father managed inexplicably to dodge a sizable list of disastrous medical outcomes that could easily, as his doctors warned us, have befallen him: there was no eleventh-hour heart attack; his severe pneumonia cleared up for the most part; we were spared any debates over feeding tube protocols; and there were no nursing home scenarios, which would have been excruciating, owing to a bed shortage in Nova Scotia that would likely have meant him being sent a hundred miles away. I even prevented a nurse from accidentally drawing blood, which, for reasons too complex to describe to her, would have plunged him into an ocean of pain. All of these scary options were taken off the table by the gentle Father of Providence.

There were more graces. On Friday morning, April 27, around 5:30 in the morning, my sister Cindy was crying softly by his bed during the vigil shift we split. My father woke up and asked her, in his affectionately gruff way, “Why are you crying?”

“Because I wish I could trade places with you,” she replied.

He looked at her intently, and said, “I’m okay, Cindy; I don’t mind.” And drifted back to sleep.

Not too long after, his eyes opened, and he blurted, “Come on God, let me go, please…come on.” Then a very long pause. And then he perked up: “Oh—okay,” as though some inner point of disagreement had been amicably settled.

Back he went into that peaceful slumber.

 

 

Later in the morning, a kindly looking man turned the corner into the unit to visit my father. Then I recognized him—a team leader on my first Challenge weekend, the youth wing of the Cursillo Movement, on November 4-5, 1979. That weekend was the occasion of strong graces for me and my family. I remembered Deacon Wilf Boudreau from my framed picture of the weekend, and I had not seen him since. Yet here he was, almost 40 years later, his face shining with happy confidence. We reminisced about what the Lord has done in our family, beginning, in important ways, with that retreat weekend. Deacon Wilf said a prayer with me, and for Jack.

Three hours later, in the bosom of the Easter Season, my dad quietly slipped into his own Holy Saturday experience.

I’ll mention one more grace. A few days before he went to meet his Lord, my dad—who was, shall we say, not prone to overt public compliments to my mother—blurted out to her at the foot of the bed, “I just want to tell you that you look beautiful today.” My flummoxed mom caught her breath and smiled, and my sister and I wondered how long it would take her to retrieve her jaw off the floor. It was lovely.

Our task going forward is to continue adjusting to the new normal of not being able to call or see him in person again in this life. Jack’s idols included Muhammad Ali, Archie Bunker (he played Archie to my Meathead many times when I was a brain dead liberal), Elvis, Jack Nicklaus, Father Mike Scanlan, TOR, and Bobby Hull. He also despised the Montreal Canadiens, and all their pomps and all their works. I miss him.

I have re-read parts of A Grief Observed by C.S. Lewis, the blunt opening line of which tells the truth: “no one told me grief feels so like fear.” That’s about right. These days, I feel fragile, oversensitive to noise, prone to getting teary-eyed over mildly sentimental things. Sarcasm on Twitter and Facebook vexes me, especially my own. I feel the need to be around people but I don’t necessarily want them to talk to me.

As I finish out the second month of the “year of firsts” without him, I’m still a strange blend of numb and anxious. There is no guidebook to grief. There’s only the present moment in which to surrender—to be. As the Big Book of A.A., with which my father was familiar, puts it, “time takes time.”

Requiescat in pace, Dad. Give St. Naomi a squeeze for us.

 

This blog was originally published at The National Catholic Register HERE

 

85: Contraception and the Eclipse of the Body—Christopher West (video segment)

85: Contraception and the Eclipse of the Body—Christopher West (video segment- full audio below)

This was a really fascinating conversation with the world’s best known expositor of the Theology of the Body by St. John Paul II. In his second appearance on The Patrick Coffin Show, Christopher West is in fine form connecting all manner of dots as we talk about the impact of dissent from Humanae Vitae, the 1968 encyclical by soon-to-be-St. Paul VI, in light of West’s new ebook, Eclipse of the Body. If you use the code ECLIPSE you can get a copy free + shipping by clicking HERE. If you enjoy Christopher’s writing and speaking, you will love this.

 

In this episode you will learn:

  • How the “errors of Russia” in the message of Fatima have to do with the destruction of marriage and family
  • The way in which the sexual revolution started with exalting the body, is now running its last lap because of debasing the body
  • How the gender confusion in the world has affected the divine liturgy
  • Why the transgenderism movement is an inevitable consequence of dissent from Humanae Vitae
  • The deep influence of St. John Paul II in the writing and implementing of Humanae Vitae
  • How profound is the connection between the small r real presence of Christ in the marital act is organically tied to the capital R of the Real Presence in the Eucharist

 

Resources recommended in this episode:

 

Question of the week

Do I really believe that the body, and not just the soul, is a visible reflection of God’s image and likeness? If not, why not?

Comment below or our Facebook page.

 

“Like” us on Facebook HERE

Sign up to be on the waiting list for our upcoming premium site Coffin Nation. You’ll be the first to be notified!

Tweet to Patrick HERE

 

Don’t forget to Subscribe to the show in YouTube, as well as the full length podcast available in iTunes and other podcast directories, while you are there, please leave an honest review.

Ratings and reviews are extremely helpful and greatly appreciated. Thank you!

            

 

 

 

Please share it using the social media buttons below.

TransformU—Editing your Life Story with Jordan Peterson

TransformU—Editing your Life Story with Jordan Peterson (full-length)

 

This is a full-length sample of one of our new segments called TransformU which is normally published in our NEW members-only website, Coffin Nation.

To see all that membership of Coffin Nation gives you go here.

Registration will re-open soon! Join the waiting list: https://www.coffinnation.com

Enjoy!

 

In a short span of time, less than 18 months, Dr. Jordan B. Peterson has joined the club of public figures of whom we say they “need no introduction.”  

He is not only a Canadian clinical psychologist and a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, and author of Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief and 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote To Chaos, Peterson is a bona fide internet sensation, with speaking gigs and debates arranged all over the world.

I first reached out to him in September of 2016, as he was beginning to shoot a series of videos on his YouTube channel in which he criticized political correctness and the Canadian government’s Bill C-16, which became law the next year, and which now forces speech regarding the made-up pronouns of deeply confused people known as non-binary or trans.

Back then, no one knew who we was apart from grateful student and some Canadians who were paying attention to the controversy. It’s been an honor to follow his meteoric rise, reconnect with him three additional times, and, God willing, more to come.

Peterson’s main areas of study are in abnormal, social, and personality psychology, with a particular interest in the psychology of religious and ideological belief, and the assessment and improvement of personality and performance.

Peterson studied at the University of Alberta and McGill University, before moving to Harvard University, where he was an assistant and then associate professor in the psychology department. In 1998, he moved back to Canada, as a faculty member in the psychology department at the University of Toronto, where he is currently a full professor.

This TransformU interview with him was recorded before my most recent sit-down interview in Los Angeles (the one that will be my first half million YouTube viewer video) but in some ways this is my favorite conversation with him of the four on-air times we have spoken. Dr. Peterson is quick-witted but more on the side of wisdom than cleverness. He has disclosed his own diagnosis with clinical depression. He tends to speak with a certain intensity that’s hard to describe. It’s like he’s on edge because he has so much to say but is constrained to say them one word, one sentence at a time.

The focus of the interview, after reviewing some basic facts about political correctness and his experiences being in some conflict with his employer, the University of Toronto, was his online writing program, the Self Authoring Suite.

This TransformU episode brings up many insights and provocative ideas well worth drilling into.

 

Resources recommended in this episode:

 

Downloadable Resources

 

Workbook   

Transcript

Audio

 

Check out or cool swag HERE

Tweet to Patrick HERE

Follow Patrick on Facebook HERE

Check out the store HERE

Sign up for our Inside Scoop newsletter with the best of The Patrick Coffin Show each week.

 

To listen to the full audio of this episode click the bar below the video.

Don’t forget to Subscribe to the show in YouTube, as well as the full length podcast available in iTunes and other podcast directories, while you are there, please leave an honest review. Ratings and reviews are extremely helpful and greatly appreciated!

            

 

 

 

Please share it using the social media buttons below.

#84: Supreme Court of Canada Jumps the Shark—Bruce Pardy (video segment)

#84: Supreme Court of Canada Jumps the Shark—Bruce Pardy  (full audio podcast below)

Canada has many private colleges and universities. It almost had a Christian law school. The number of these will remain zero for the foreseeable future thanks for a stunning 7-2 decision by Canada’s Supreme Court that forbids the establishment of the Trinity Western Law School in Langley, BC.

The reason?

Because Trinity Western is an evangelical institution that holds to the traditional biblical view of sexuality, and because prospective students must sign a Covenant Agreement in which they agree to avoid drunkenness, gossip, plagiarism, any form of hazing or intimidation, with emphasis (I’m quoting now) the Christian “virtues of honesty, civility, truthfulness, generosity and integrity.” Trinity Western make no bones about the fact that its “community life are formed by a firm commitment to the person and work of Jesus Christ as declared in the Bible.”

So far so good. Except that the Agreement also says the following:

  • observe modesty, purity and appropriate intimacy in all relationships, reserve sexual expressions of intimacy for marriage, and within marriage take every reasonable step to resolve conflict and avoid divorce
  • sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of marriage between a man and a woman

No explicit reference to homosexuality here, but touching (or approaching too close) to the untouchable third rail is exactly what triggered the legal battle, starting with the Law Societies of B.C., Ontario, and Nova Scotia, that eventually went all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Bruce Pardy was introduced to me by Dr. Jordan Peterson. Pardy is professor of law at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, and he thinks this decision is a cruel joke on all Canadians. In my interview, he explains exactly why. Professor Pardy has a libertarian-style view of the definition of marriage, and the TWU Covenant Agreement is not his cup of tea. But that’s not the point, is it? What happened to good old Canadian diversity? Is there really no room for even one Christian law school that upholds the traditional biblical view of marriage? This view, one notes, is shared generally by the Catholic Church, many other Protestant bodies, as well as Orthodox Jewish, Mormons, and Muslim organizations (the non-polygamous ones at any rate).

If someone is offended by the rules of a private school, he or she should refuse to go. No problem. But that’s not enough for the LGBTQS2 (lesbian gay bisexual transgender questioning two spirited) activists who opposed the school’s plans from the get-go, despite the fact that TWU is a private institution of higher learning. Backed by powerful legal interests across Canada and a broadly accepted presupposition about the redefinition of marriage and the ever “evolving Canadian Charter values,” their fight ended last month with this astounding decision. 

 

In this episode you will learn:

  • How the shift from Charter rights (which are concrete, verbally explicit things) to Charter values (which are ephemeral, fleeting things) softened the ground for the high Court’s reasoning
  • How the interests of a tiny minority became the tail that currently wags the Canadian dog
  • Why the Court’s reasoning unwittingly promotes very unjust discrimination the Justices opine they oppose
  • The eerie similarity between “the vibe of the thing” (a comedy reference that will make sense once you hear the interview) and the “penumbra” of the 1965 Griswold v Connecticut, which paved the way for Roe v Wade via an alleged “right to privacy” in the U.S. Constitution
  • How this disastrous decision is a wake-up call for those who have been lulled into thinking reasonable accommodations will be made going forward for private educational institutions that go against the grain of PC culture.
  • Why it may signal the death knell of the much-vaunted pluralism that has characterized Canadian society since the Quebec Act of 1774
  • Why it should matter to Muslims, Jews, Sikhs, the Salvation Army, Mormons, or any group that assumes they can freely form communities with their own self-regulating rules

 

Resources recommended in this episode:

 

Question of the week

How did it come about that the court system has slowly become activist against and domineering toward traditional Christian beliefs?

 

Check out or cool swag HERE

Tweet to Patrick HERE

Follow Patrick on Facebook HERE

Check out the store HERE

Sign up for our Inside Scoop newsletter with the best of The Patrick Coffin Show each week.

 

To listen to the full audio of this episode click the bar below the video.

Don’t forget to Subscribe to the show in YouTube, as well as the full length podcast available in iTunes and other podcast directories, while you are there, please leave an honest review. Ratings and reviews are extremely helpful and greatly appreciated!

            

 

 

 

Please share it using the social media buttons below.

#83: Pope Francis and the Crisis of Confusion—Bishop Rene Henry Gracida

#83: Pope Francis and the Crisis of Confusion—Bishop Rene Henry Gracida (video segment— full audio below)

A few minutes into my conversation with Bishop Gracida, bishop emeritus of Corpus Christi, TX, it becomes obvious that he is direct and to the point, evidently allergic to beating around the bush. Yet, he’s kindly and thoughtful. At 95, he is hale and hearty, and is one of the very few bishops who regularly blog. His remarks, sometimes trenchant, always readable, are found at www.abyssum.org Abyssus Abyssum Invocat, Latin for “deep calls to deep” (from Psalm 42:7).

If you feel somewhat disoriented by some of the utterances and writings of Pope Francis, you’re not alone. If the thought of criticizing the Pope makes you uncomfortable (there are plenty of nasty professional Francis Haters online), that’s a good sign of filial devotion to the Holy Father and to the Church he visibly leads. Sometimes, though, the faithful have “the right and even at times the duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church and to make their opinion known to the rest of the Christian faithful” (Canon 212.3).

In this regards, Bishop Gracida has some questions that fearlessly “go there.” What do I mean? The authorized biography of disgraced Godfried Cardinal Daneels of Belgium describes activities between and among cardinal electors, such as Cardinal Carlo Martini, Cardinal Achille Silvestrini, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, and Cardinals Karl Lehmann and Walter Kasper—dubbed the St. Galen Mafia. These activities, verified by Austin Ivereigh in his hagiographic biography of Pope Francis, The Great Reformer: Francis and the Making Of a Radical Pope involve canvassing other electors to elect Jorge Cardinal Bergolio.

Well…

Bishop Rene Gracida believes, as do others, that this activity is canonically illegal under the promulgated laws in the 1996 Apostolic Constitution Universi Dominici Gregis, by St. John Paul II. If this is true, then the validity of the papal election may be in doubt. You read that right.

To state the obvious, I am not a canonist nor was I at the Conclave. What I know is that know that the reaction of most Catholic pundits to the notion that the 2013 election may have been invalid is met with a guffaw or a “that’s crazy talk.” It’s a gorilla in the room whose existence needs to be acknowledged before it can be dismissed as harmless.

 

After this interview you will:

  • Have a sense of appreciation for what Ordinaries are called to as shepherds of souls
  • Understand the difference between true episcopal authority as it resides in the individual bishop and the largely administrative authority of a national bishops’ conference
  • Get a clear picture of a self-described “one crisis after another” life lived to the full
  • See more reasons to renew your prayers for the life and health of the Church
  • Understand why the sacraments must never be politicized no matter who does it
  • Maybe be shaken up!

 

Resources recommended in this episode:

 

Question of the week

Do I pray regularly for the leaders God has placed over me?

 

Check out or cool swag HERE

Tweet to Patrick HERE

Follow Patrick on Facebook HERE

Check out the store HERE

Sign up for our Inside Scoop newsletter with the best of The Patrick Coffin Show each week.

 

To listen to the full audio of this episode click the bar below the video.

Don’t forget to Subscribe to the show in YouTube, as well as the full length podcast available in iTunes and other podcast directories, while you are there, please leave an honest review. Ratings and reviews are extremely helpful and greatly appreciated!

            

 

 

 

Please share it using the social media buttons below.

#82: When (and why) Protestants become Catholic—Ken Hensley

 

#82: When (and why) Protestants become Catholic—Ken Hensley (video segment— full audio below)

Becoming a Catholic was hard for Ken Hensley. He fought an uphill battle against his own prejudices and presuppositions about Catholicism. His wife was not with him whatsoever, at least not in the beginning. His Baptist congregation elders met privately and stripped him of his ordination faculties. And he had no idea what to do or where to go next.

But he HAD met a fellow Protestant when he was investigating a graduate degree at Fuller Theological Seminary, by the name of Scott Hahn.

Fast forward to today, and, as a senior staffer with the Coming Home Network (founded by EWTN TV host Marcus Grodi) Ken works with dozens of Protestant clergymen, and some women leaders, as they navigate the at-times choppy waters of the Tiber River. Do I dare cross? Are the truths of the Catholic Church true? What will happen to my ministry if I become Catholic? My wife is dead set against me becoming Catholic, now what?

Ken knows all about these questions because they were his.

We talked about the reasons Protestants first become interested in Catholicism, the attitude they should have going forward, and the ways in which Catholics can help them through their struggles.

 

In this interview you will learn:

  • The mains reasons why Protestant clergy begin to take the Church’s truth claims seriously
  • The importance of studying the right sources, in addition to prayer
  • Influential converts and why their stories are important for Catholics to hear
  • How the principle of the so-called Reformation led to the current splinterization of Protestantism
  • How to distinguish false ecumenism from the real thing

 

Resources recommended in this episode:

 

Question of the week

What is the next right step I need to take to become a more effective evangelizer?

 

Tweet to Patrick HERE

Follow Patrick on Facebook HERE

Check out the store HERE

Sign up for our Inside Scoop newsletter with the best of The Patrick Coffin Show each week.

 

To listen to the full audio of this episode click the bar below the video.

Don’t forget to Subscribe to the show in YouTube, as well as the full length podcast available in iTunes and other podcast directories, while you are there, please leave an honest review. Ratings and reviews are extremely helpful and greatly appreciated!

            

 

 

 

Please share it using the social media buttons below.